国产v片,日韩精品中文字幕一区二区,美女被娇喘视频 http://www.cacee.com.cn 金屬磁記憶|無損檢測|無損探傷|動力診斷|應(yīng)力集中檢測儀 Tue, 21 Aug 2018 03:25:27 +0000 zh-Hans hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.4 Non-contact magnetometric diagnostics of potentially hazard-ous sections of buried pipelines susceptible to failure http://www.cacee.com.cn/2018/08/20/brexit-could-lead-to-significant-construction-job-losses/ http://www.cacee.com.cn/2018/08/20/brexit-could-lead-to-significant-construction-job-losses/#respond Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:05:01 +0000 https://the7.io/construction/?p=316 A.A. Dubov, Al.A. Dubov, S.M. Kolokolnikov, Wu Jin Song, Yu Hongda

Abstract: The article considers the non-contact magnetometric diagnostics (NCMD) of buried pipelines.

In Russia, China and other countries the NCMD is used for gas and oil pipelines, water conduits, heating system pipelines and other service buried pipelines.

The main task of the NCMD is the detection of the potentially dangerous sections of buried pipelines, on which, as a rule, it is impossible to carry out the in line inspection.

Based on the 20 years experience in the metal magnetic memory (MMM) method in 2000 Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd. began development the NCMD of buried pipelines using the specialized multi-channel highly sensitive flux-gate sensors as a unit of TSC-type instrument. The NCMD is based on measurement of distortions of the magnetic field of the earth, conditioned by the variation of the pipe metal magnetization in SCZs and in zones of developing corrosion-fatigue damages.

Test results of buried pipelines by the NCMD are presented. A complex diagnostics of buried pipelines based on the NCMD with identification of potentially hazardous segments and subsequent NDT in prospect holes is offered.

Keywords: stress concentration, buried pipelines, magnetic memory of metal, field welded joints, stress-strain?state, non-destructive testing.

1 Introduction

The non-contact magnetometric diagnostics (NCMD) of buried pipelines or pipelines covered with a thick layer of insulation is a relatively new type of technical diagnostics, which is ambiguously perceived in the scientific and technical community of traditional non-destructive testing.

However, the analysis of the fifteen-year practice of this direction development, the statistics and the results of the carried out inspections suggest a promising development of this direction of the technical diagnostics.

The NCMD is based on detection of distortions of the magnetic field of the earth (HЕ), intensity conditioned by the variation of the pipe metal’s magnetic permeability in stress concentration zones (SCZ) and in zones of developing corrosion-fatigue damages.

The pattern of the HЕ field intensity variations is conditioned by the pipeline strain occurring in it due to the exposure to a number of factors: the residual process and installation stresses, the working load and self-compensation stresses at outdoor air and environment (soil, water, etc.) temperature fluctuation.

Based on the 20 years experience in the metal magnetic memory (MMM) method in 2000 Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd. began development of the NCMD of buried pipelines using the specialized multi-channel highly sensitive flux-gate sensors as a unit of TSC-type instrument.

The main task of NCMD is detection of the potentially dangerous segments of buried pipelines.

Currently the NCMD, based on the MMM method, is carried out according to regulatory documents [1-5]. The

experience of the NCMD of pipelines buried under the soil layer at the depth of 2 to 3 m or deeper is described, for example, in paper [6]. The main objective of all diagnostic methods and tools during the state assessment of continuously operated pipelines is the search for and identification of potentially hazardous segments with developing damages. The inspection results must provide an answer to the question: “Where and when to expect damage or an accident?” If this problem is solved, in this case there is a possibility to timely replace or repair a potentially hazardous segment.

 

2 Technique and equipment for NCMD of buried pipelines

2.1 NCMD technique and requirements to operator

During the NCMD of buried pipelines the same parameters of the MMM method are used. During the NCMD three components of the magnetic field of the earth (НЕ),? will be measured above buried pipeline (Figure 1).

The criteria and the program software, developed at Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd. based on the metal magnetic memory method [7-9], are applied for decoding of the information about the pipelines condition by variations of the magnetic field of the earth recorded at the depth of 200 to 300 mm from the earth surface.

In particular, clear relation between the variation frequency of all the three magnetic field components and the pipe standard size (diameter, wall thickness and pipe length between the joints) was found. These qualitative diagnostic parameters, detected during NCMD, characterize the SCZ – the sources of various-type damages development – within the pipe metal macro volume.

 

Figure.1. NCMD performance: During NCMD three components of the magnetic field of the earth HE will be measured above buried pipeline.

?

Special training is strongly recommended for NCMD performance.

A center for experts training in the NCMD operates at Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd. Certification Body (Reutov, Moscow region). The training program incorporates the course of training in the metal magnetic memory method (8 working days) and the additional course of training in NCMD (2 working days). During the last six years more than 200 experts in NCMD from 40 diagnostic companies were trained in Russia.

The following tasks are the most complex at practical learning to use the NCMD:

– selection of the optimal expert movement speed along the route without loosing of authentic data (magnetic parameters) on the pipeline condition;

– determination of the pipeline axis with a pipeline finder and of the pipeline field location using a GPS-navigator;

– route preparation for the inspection and offsetting from interferences encountered on the experts travel path along the route (power lines, automobile roads, metal barriers, buildings and structures, etc.);

– processing of inspection results and classification of magnetic anomalies by categories of the pipeline damages development hazard;

– selection of top priority sites for soil opening (“prospecting”).

In the course of experts training in the NCMD Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd. Certification Body issues recommendations on the distinctive features of magnetic anomalies and diagnostic parameters that allow to distinguish maximum stress concentration zones (before the damage development) from the zone of the developing corrosion damage. The existing criteria allow to detect defected welded joints and to distinguish them from the joints in a satisfactory condition.

 

1.2. NCMD equipment.

The non-contact magnetometric diagnostics of underground pipeline segments is performed using the highly sensitive sensors and TSC type instruments manufactured by Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd. (Moscow).

Figure 2 shows the instrument complex for the NCMD manufactured by Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd. on a commercial basis.

The NCMD performance by using the instrument complex in urban conditions and in cross country ones are presented on the Fig.2,b and Fig.3.

 

a) b)

Figure 2. The instrument complex for NCMD:

a-Appearance of the scanning device: 1 – road wheel; 2 – length-counting unit; 3 – Type 11 sensor attachment unit; 4 – Type 11 sensor; 5 – handle; 6 – measuring instrument mounting unit; 7 – folding support leg; 8 – universal head;

b – the NCMD performance by using the instrument complex in urban conditions.

 

Figure 3. The NCMD performance by using the instrument complex in cross country conditions.

 

At magnetograms decoding the most complex task is classification of magnetic anomalies by types of damages. Some companies, while trying to make an impact on the customer during the solution of this problem, indulge in wishful thinking. During the additional pipeline inspection in prospect holes the detected defects are further presented as defects found by NCMD before the segment opening. In fact, the current level of NCMD development, as a rule, does not allow to state before prospecting the type of defect that corresponds to the detected anomaly.

At magnetograms decoding it is necessary to consider the specific conditions and structural features of inspected pipelines. For example, operating conditions and, accordingly, the condition of gas pipelines located in southern regions of the country noticeably differ from gas pipelines located in the north.

 

  1. Results of comprehensive testing and analysis.

2.1. NCMD of duried oil pipelines.

Figure 4 shows the fragment of the magnetogram recorded during the NCMD an oil pipeline (? 377′10, pressure 2.5 MPa). This oil pipeline was in operation from 1965. Anomaly of the magnetic field intensity was marked on the diagram. After soil excavation additional visual detected the damage of plastic coat and pitting corrosion up to 4 mm depth was detected in the prospect hole.

 

Figure 4. NCMD of interfield oil pipeline (?37710, medium pressure P=2.5 MPa): 1- distribution of three components of geomagnetic field intensity HE; 2- distribution of the magnetic field gradient dHE/dx; 3 – the section of buried pipeline with anomalous magnetic field distribution. Anomaly was proposed for additional examination in the prospect hole. Delamination of pipe insulation and development of external pitting corrosion with 4 mm deep pits was found in the prospect hole on the section with anomalous magnetic field distribution.

?

Oil pipeline (?325 mm) inspection was performed in March 2013 in urban conditions in the town of Dong Ying (China). Figure 5,a, shows the magnetogram recorded during NCMD, on which two sections are marked. The first section corresponds to the manifold cover location, which caused an obstacle during the inspection performance. The second section with typical anomalous distribution of the magnetic field intensity was recommended for additional inspection in the prospect hole. After the pavement opening, the additional visual examination in the prospect hole resulted in detection of the oil pipe damaging with diameter of about 10mm (Figure 5,b).

In Russia and China criminal pipeline tie-ins are an illegal challenge to economic security of the countries. NCMD is one of the technical solutions to detect such criminal tie-ins.

NCMD of the oil pipeline (?529mm) was carried out in Huandao (China) in 2014. Figure 6,a, presents the NCMD results and highlights the section of anomalous distribution of the НЕ magnetic field intensity and the field gradient dHЕ/dx. This section was recommended for additional inspection in the prospect hole. The additional visual examination in the prospect hole detected a criminal oil pipeline tie-in.

 

а)

 

  1. b)

Figure 5. Results of oil pipeline (?325 mm) NCMD in urban conditions:

  1. a) Magnetogram of the НЕ field intensity distribution with highlighted anomalies: 1-manifold cover location; 2-anomaly detected during NCMD and recommended for pavement opening and carrying out of the additional inspection in the prospect hole; 3-oil pipeline damage location;
  2. b) Results of additional oil pipeline inspection in the area of detected anomaly after the pavement opening. After the pavement opening, the additional visual examination in the prospect hole resulted in detection of the oil pipeline damaging (a hole with diameter of about 10mm).

?

Figure 6. Results of oil pipeline (?529 mm) NCMD:

  1. a) Magnetogram of the НЕ field intensity distribution with the highlighted anomaly;
  2. b) Results of additional oil pipeline inspection in the area of detected anomaly. A criminal tie-in was detected in the prospect hole after the pipeline opening.

 

2.2. NCMD of buried gas pipelines.

Figure 7 presents the NCMD results of the low pressure gas pipeline bend section (?30’’ (~?762′12 mm), P=1.2 MPa) (Azerbaijan) with the highlighted section of anomalous distribution of the НЕ magnetic field intensity and the field gradient dHЕ/dx.

This section was recommended for additional inspection in the prospect hole.

Inspection by the contact MMM method was carried out in the prospect hole (Figure 8,a) at the first stage. Inspection by the MMM method detected two SCZs (SCZ No.1 and SCZ No.2) marked in Figure 8,b. Insulation was opened and ultrasonic testing (UT) was performed in the areas of detected SCZs.

A 50mm long discontinuity flaw was detected at the depth of 9mm during UT performance in the SCZ No.1. UT in the SCZ No.2 detected a 100mm long discontinuity flaw at the depth of 11mm. Based on the current regulatory documents, both discontinuity flaws were unacceptable.

?

Figure 7. Results of gas pipeline bend section (?30’’ (~?762′12mm), P=1.2 MPa) NCMD. The magnetogram shows the anomalous distribution of the НЕ magnetic field intensity and the field gradient dHЕ/dx and highlights the anomaly (1).

?

a)

 

b)

c)

Figure 8. Results of gas pipeline bend section (?30’’ (~?762′12mm), P=1.2 MPa) inspection in the prospect hole in the detected anomaly:

  1. a) Prospect hole at the route bend section;
  2. b) Results of the additional inspection in the prospect hole by the contact MMM method without the insulation removal. The diagram highlights the detected SCZ: 1- SCZ No.1; 2- SCZ No.2;
  3. c) Arrangement scheme of SCZ detected by the MMM method without the insulation removal. In both of the SCZ 80 to 120 mm long discontinuity flaws were detected UT at the depth of 8 to 11mm.

 

2.3. NCMD of main gas pipeline potentially hazardous welded joints.

At present JSC “Gazprom” pays great attention to ensuring reliability of main gas pipeline (MGP) field welded joints both during the construction of new gas pipelines and in conditions of their overhaul [11].

However, a significant amount of main gas pipelines with circumferential welded joints produced in field conditions is in continuous operation (for 30 years or longer). It is known that the circumferential welded joints on gas pipelines are much less reliable than the factory welded joints. We also know that 30-40 years ago methods and means of field welded joints non-destructive testing were insufficiently developed compared to the present time. Special studies during the quality control of field welded joints after the long-term operation of MGPs often detect unacceptable defects according to both old and new sorting standards [12].

Field welded joints are typically produced during welding of stressed gas pipelines “closing” ends. Therefore circumferential field welded joints with high level of residual stress have high potential energy, which is released in the process of their failure. And such failures often occur on continuously operated gas pipelines both in Russia and other countries.

In addition, individual field welded joints have high levels of residual stresses formed during their fabrication. That is why their sudden failures occur in continuously operated main gas pipelines. And such failures often occur in the pipelines, both in Russia and in other countries.

For example, failure of buried ?500mm gas pipeline operating under pressure of 12MPa occurred in the Polish gas system in January 2014. Gas explosion and subsequent fire destroyed the nearby houses and other buildings. The accident investigation established that a circumferential field welded joint was the source of the gas pipeline failure (Figure 9). At the time of failure the pipeline was in operation for more than 40 years.

 

Figure 9. Failure of a ?500mm gas pipeline circumferential field welded joint after 40 years of operation.

?

24 km of underground pipeline segments were inspected using BMD under a contract with the Polish company “Gazsistema” during the period from 2011 to 2013. Based on the results of BMD, it was recommended to carry out additional examination in prospect holes of 10 maximum anomalies.

Figure 10 shows the fragment of the magnetogram recorded during the inspection in the non-contact mode of one of the considered pipeline segments. In accordance with the used technique, the magnetic anomaly marked in figure 10 characterizes the circumferential welded joint location.

After opening the underground pipeline segments circumferential field welded joints were found in all areas with magnetic anomalies previously identified based on the BMD results. Additional inspection of shells and field welded joints was carried out using the metal magnetic memory method and ultrasonic testing.

Based on the complex control results, the condition of gas pipeline shells metal after 40 years of their operation was satisfactory based on existing standards, and in eight of the ten field joints the MMM method identified the SCZ, in which the ultrasonic method detected unacceptable defects typically in the form of lack of fusion in the weld root and in fusion zones with the pipe base metal.

 

Figure 10. Magnetogram of gas pipeline segment non-contact inspection: 1- distribution of three components of geomagnetic field intensity HE; 2- distribution of the magnetic field gradient dHE/dx; 3 – anomaly corresponding to the welded joint with high level of stress concentration.

 

Let us consider in more detail the inspection results of one of such joints.

Figure 11 shows the “prospecting” (opening) location of a gas pipeline segment with the detected magnetic anomaly (Figure 10).

Based on the visual examination of this segment, the condition of the gas pipeline shell metal was satisfactory. However, the circumferential field welded joint inspection by the MMM method detected the area with significant inhomogeneity of the magnetic field and its gradient (dH/dx) distribution. In areas of maximum magnetic field gradient values, corresponding to the zones of maximum stress concentration, the additional UT was carried out. Based on the results of the UT in the SCZ identified by MMM method, unacceptable defects were detected in the form of discontinuities located at different depths of the welded joint. Similar magnetograms with anomalies, characterizing high stress concentration, were found in prospect holes in eight out of the ten inspected circumferential field welds.

Unacceptable defects that apparently formed during welding of joints in the course of pipelines installation create high stress concentration in local areas of potential damage

a) ??????? b)

Figure 11. Gas pipeline segment after its opening in the magnetic anomaly zone for additional inspection by the MMM method and ultrasonic testing (a) and the diagram of inspection by the MMM method of a circumferential field welded joint of the ?400 mm gas pipeline pipes: 1 – location of circumferential (field) welded joint; 2- distribution of the SMLF gradient dHL/dx along the welded joint; 3 – the SCZ corresponding to the maximal value of the field gradient. Unacceptable defects. in the form of discontinuities located at different depths of the welded joint were detected by additional UT.

?

It should be noted here that, according to the approximate estimate, the 24-km length of gas pipelines, inspected by the non-contact magnetometric method, contained about 800 field girth welded joints. Only 10 sections with detected magnetic anomalies, characterizing the maximum stress concentration on girth welded joints, were recommended for opening. This makes just 1 to 1.2% of the total number of field butt joints.

References
[1] GD 102-008-2002. The instruction for diagnostics of pipelines technical condition by non-contact magnetometric method. Moscow: VNIIST, 2002. 52 p.
[2] Methodical guideline for non-contact magnetometric inspection of gas and oil pipelines. Moscow: Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd., 2003. 49 p.
[3] GAZPROM. Temporary technical requirements to the equipment for non-contact remote gas pipelines magnetometry during the ground inspection.
[4] The technique for heat lines inspection by the non-contact magnetometric method. (Developed by Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd.).
[5] The technique for operated heat lines residual life determination by the non-contact magnetometric method.
[6] A.A. Dubov, Al.A. Dubov. Experience of the pipelines non-contact magnetometric diagnostics application and perspectives of its development // Control. Diagnostics, 2014, No.4. pp.64-67.
[7] IIW document V-1347-06r4 Dubov A. A., Dubov Al. A., Kolokolnikov S. M., Training handbook. The method of metal magnetic memory (MMM) and inspection instruments.
[8] V.T. Vlasov, A.A. Dubov. Physical bases of the metal magnetic memory method. Moscow: ZAO “TISSO”, 2004. 424 p.
[9] А. Dubov, S. Kolokolnikov. “Assessment of the material state of oil and gas pipelines state based on the metal magnetic memory method”. Welding in the World, 2012, vol.56, no. 03/04, pp.11-19.
[10] GD 51-1-98. The technique for on-line computer diagnostics of local gas pipeline segments using the metal magnetic memory. Moscow: Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd., 1998.? 44 p.
[11] E.M. Vyshemirsky. Gazprom OJSC Technical policy in welding production and non-destructive testing of welded joints quality // V Mire NC, 2014, No.1. pp. 5-11.
]]>
http://www.cacee.com.cn/2018/08/20/brexit-could-lead-to-significant-construction-job-losses/feed/ 0
老化設(shè)備殘余壽命評估問題 http://www.cacee.com.cn/2016/06/28/curabitur-cursus-condimentum-ex-non-aliquam/ http://www.cacee.com.cn/2016/06/28/curabitur-cursus-condimentum-ex-non-aliquam/#respond Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:04:56 +0000 https://the7.io/construction/?p=317

杜波夫

《動力診斷》公司 俄羅斯 莫斯科

(譯文:國際機械科技發(fā)展研究會專家組 北京 100037)

摘要:根據(jù)對于現(xiàn)有的、在工業(yè)各個部門中已形成的老化設(shè)備殘余壽命評估做法的分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)一些共性問題,即傳統(tǒng)的無損檢測方法和手段有效性較低,強度驗算不夠完善。文章指出,設(shè)備和結(jié)構(gòu)的可靠性和壽命取決于應(yīng)力集中區(qū)——損傷發(fā)展的主要根源。金屬磁記憶法是唯一能以很高的精度確定設(shè)備上的缺陷部位的方法,使用金屬磁記憶法用來評價設(shè)備壽命最為有效。

關(guān)鍵字:設(shè)備壽命評估

保障設(shè)備、容器、天然氣和石油輸送管道以及各種結(jié)構(gòu)工作的可靠性問題變得一年比一年迫切。這是因為許多工業(yè)部門中的設(shè)備的老化已大大超過技術(shù)改造的速度。例如,在動力工業(yè)中,截止到2002年9月,90%的火電站設(shè)備已耗盡額定壽命,其中相當(dāng)大的一部分達(dá)到物理磨損。由于缺乏有科學(xué)依據(jù)的技術(shù)診斷和壽命評估構(gòu)想以及金屬傳統(tǒng)型無損檢測方法和手段有效性較差,上述問題變得更加嚴(yán)重。

根據(jù)對現(xiàn)有的、在工業(yè)各部門中已形成的老化設(shè)備殘余壽命評估做法的分析,可以劃分出下列普遍性趨勢:

第一,設(shè)備可靠性領(lǐng)域的眾多專家,正在由基于故障統(tǒng)計的壽命概率評估方法過渡到基于綜合性做法的老化設(shè)備個體性壽命評估,后者是把有損和無損檢測結(jié)果同強度驗算結(jié)合在一起。

第二,壽命評估中出現(xiàn)了由探傷過度到技術(shù)診斷的明顯趨勢,后者是基于斷裂力學(xué)、金屬學(xué)和無損檢測的結(jié)合。而設(shè)備和結(jié)構(gòu)應(yīng)力-變形狀況的無損檢測上升到第一位。

第三,認(rèn)識到應(yīng)對老化設(shè)備進(jìn)行100%的考察,以便確定有潛在危險的區(qū)域。

同時,應(yīng)當(dāng)指出,實施這些做法時存在下列缺點和不完備之處。

在綜合采用各種無損和有損檢測方法與手段時,沒有針對具體檢測對象的嚴(yán)格確定的程序和順序。

大家知道,設(shè)備檢測的程序、范圍和周期,一方面取決于額定(計算)壽命、損傷概率、修理間隔期,而另一方面又取決于現(xiàn)有的檢測方法和手段及其能力。

只是一些個別的、最重要的工業(yè)部門(如原子能動力和火電),才有關(guān)于設(shè)備檢測程式和周期以及延長其使役期限的規(guī)范[1、2、3]。即使在這些先進(jìn)行業(yè)中(從組織對于設(shè)備金屬狀況監(jiān)視的觀點看),也存在著如何確定金屬極限狀態(tài)和評估設(shè)備個體壽命問題[4]。

當(dāng)前推薦的強度驗算方法大致可以分成四類:

-按照金屬腐蝕速度的計算方法;

-金屬抗裂紋強度計算方法;

-金屬疲勞計算方法;

-蠕變條件下工作的設(shè)備部件的計算方法。

然而,這些方法的主要不足之處在于,它們提出的允許應(yīng)力水平[σ]較低。一般情況下,這一水平為[σ]≤σ0.2/2,式中σ0.2-金屬假定屈服點。但是,實踐證明,設(shè)備的可靠性和壽命主要是由應(yīng)力集中區(qū)決定的,而在應(yīng)力集中區(qū)實際應(yīng)力水平可能達(dá)到屈服點甚至更高。

]]>
http://www.cacee.com.cn/2016/06/28/curabitur-cursus-condimentum-ex-non-aliquam/feed/ 0